Continental Shelf Meaning, Principle and Case Laws Current Affairs
1 The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v Netherlands) ('North Sea Continental Shelf Cases'), decided in 1969, were the first cases concerning the delimitation of maritime zones seaward of the territorial sea. Some thirty cases have followed since then (Maritime.
I.C.J. Decision In North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Continental Shelf Boundaries; Relationship
Get North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands), 1969 I.C.J. 3 (Feb. 20) (Summary of the Decision) (1969), International Court of Justice, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated
4. North Sea Continental Shelf Case (I.C.J. Reports, 1969) NORTH SEA CONTINENTAL SHELF CASES
Six states (the United Kingdom, France, Norway, Germany, the Netherlands, and Belgium) maintain continental shelf claims in the North Sea, a resource-rich and economically important body of water off the coast of western and northern Europe. Control of the continental shelf allows a State the exclusive rights to resource extraction from the.
North Sea Continental Shelf Case Law Optional Naweed Akhter UPSC 2024 Rau's IAS YouTube
Judgment of 20 February 1969. The Court delivered judgment, by 11 votes to 6, in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases. The dispute, which was submitted to the Court on 20 February 1967, related to the delimitation of the continental shelf between the Federal Republic of Germany and Denmark on the one hand, and between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Netherlands on the other.
1 North Sea Continental Shelf Cases Treaty International Law
"North Sea Continental Shelf, Germany v Denmark, Merits, Judgment, (1969) ICJ Rep 3, ICGJ 150 (ICJ 1969), 20th February 1969, United Nations [UN]; International Court of Justice [ICJ]" published on by Oxford University Press.
North Sea Continental Shelf Case Jurisprudence Rule Of Law
The decision of the International Court of Justice in the North Sea Continental Shelf Cases is surely one of the most interesting as well as debatable decisions in the history of the Court. It deals with certain aspects of one of the most important new developments of international law, the doctrine of the Continental Shelf.
North Sea Continental Shelf Case (Treaties and Customary Law) YouTube
North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark) Judgments. Judgment of 20 February 1969 Available in: English French. See other cases involving. Germany Netherlands. Links Top Menu. Home; Contact; FAQ; Employment; Sitemap; Site search; Document search.-.. Français. Footer menu. Home; Contact;
North Sea Continental Shelf Case PDF Public International Law International Law
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE. These cases concerned the delimitation of the continental shelf of the North Sea as between Denmark and the Federal Republic of Germany, and as between the Netherlands and the Federal Republic, and were submitted to the Court by Special Agreement. The Parties asked the Court to state the principles and rules of.
The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases Sovereign Limits
Title: North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands Created Date: 20160809111359Z
what is the meaning of CONTINENTAL SHELF on the law of the sea and customary international law
denying the equidistance principle legal weight. If this case were used as precedent otherwise, it would merely direct the disputing states to look to customary international law and cooperative action. Bibliography North Sea Continental Shelf, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1969 Submitted Rudolph V Přemyslid, March 14, 2009
North Sea Continental Shelf Case PDF Territorial Waters International Law
This contribution discusses the judgment of the International Court of Justice in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases between Denmark and the Netherlands on the one hand, and Germany on the other. After setting out the background to the dispute and the judgment of the Court, it focuses on the Court's discussion of the sources of international.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases.docx Treaty Legal Concepts
NORTH SEA CONTINENTAL SHELF (Federal Republic of Germany / Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany /Netherlands) International Court of Justice February 20, 1969 General List: Nos. 51 & 52. dated 1 December 1964, and 9 June 1965, concluded in the one case between the Federal
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (1969) LexForti PDF Territorial Waters International Law
THE NORTH SEA CONTINENTAL SHELF CASES AND LAW-MAKING CONVENTIONS. under the aegis of the United Nations has been proceeding task of codifying the rules of international law. This process resulted in the conclusion of important multilateral conventions- the four Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea (1958), the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases PDF PDF Treaty International Law
The present case covers claims of three parties with regard to a Continental Shelf in North Sea, wherein both Denmark and Netherlands submitted individual disputes with Germany to the International Court of Justice. This was done via two Special Agreements to decide the applicable principles and rules of international law.
North Sea Continental Shelf Case Digest PDF Treaty International Law
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands) Document source. International Court of Justice (ICJ) Date. 20 February 1969. Document number. I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3. Document type. Case Law. Collection. Case Law. Profile Country. Germany.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases PDF Treaty International Law
Moreover, in the present case, any such inference would immediately be nullified by the fact that, as soon as concrete delimitations of North Sea continental shelf areas began to be carried out, the Federal Republic, as described earlier (paragraphs 9 and 12), at once reserved its position with regard to those delimitations which (effected on.
